Exterior Interventions in Sovereign States

Government is only those who asked permission to take measures to eliminate them, their consent is not required and is not regarded as an intervention in the traditional sense. Those who will not try to protect the oppressed interference in the internal functioning of an area or attempting walls around a sovereign state. Support in a conflict between international legal persons. What should be the so-called intervention will have a different character, took more measures to support self-defense of a sovereign government. It is always the word intervention as still between other people. However, such measures lose their regulatory position.

This does not mean that it is justified taking action. If you intervene in a bar brawl, you can do very bad or very good. If you help the club when exacerbate the difference, if greater damage, or just join the fight with your colleagues, you're wrong. If you want to promote or advance, will also be guilty of breach of peace, as it is. If you try to change the legal authorities, are empowered in a way that is generally a threat to peace.

It is easy to see how to justify intervention, are excluded to protect the oppression of minorities. However, the future is not necessarily favorable. Just as the challenges to liberal democratic values, regression to the old ideologies can, the distribution of the lowest not constitute progress towards a new world order.... Instead, it may cause interference include regression of powerful states in the affairs of weaker States to impose their will strong against the weak, said the moral superiority, which demonstrates the technological superiority. This can be translated into modern versions of gunboat diplomacy or even more shocking, contemporary version, cruise missile diplomacy....
The possibility of regression is the main reason for not intervening 'hawk'. Up to this point, I think I'm in the 'hawks', and is ready, the borders of sovereign states in levels of intervention, the other allows the protection of individuals against those powers do not reach the consent of the clock will be awarded. But the question is simply whether intervention is justified, but that is in the middle, and this process will have to decide what is in fact justified.

Those who can authorize intervention involved, how to judge their own cause. The intervention should be kept to a contract approved in a wide range of countries. It could be a Democratic Union formed by an international treaty among democratic nations. Should be put on integration and the power to intervene in a Member States in a coup situation, or d other actions in violation of the rule has created conditions for membership. The contract can not be used to justify intervention in countries that have not ratified. This is the kind of voluntary association is a member of single species, these funds will last longer but are more likely to work long term. However, the nature of nations, is likely to sign such a contract moves are difficult to justify outside intervention themes.